So once again Obama stirs the pot of racial divide. Yes, of course there are and i think that there always will be still ignorant maladjusted racists like the RETARDED Charleston shooter? Of course. But there are also incidents of racist blacks attacking whites, such as those who play the knockout game which is a racially motivated violent game that targets whites. But you'll never hear Obama condemn black perpetrators of racial violence against whites.
Instead of acknowledging that Roof the Retarded Charleston shooter is not the majority of Americans live in today, he goes out of his way to make Roof the tiypical of the white racist in America since the days of slavery, punctuating his point by using the N-word to stir emotions. Then he digs up the image of the slain Sandy Hook children to promote his gun control agenda. Instead of being a uniter, Obama thrives on being a divider. Proving once again, that it’s better to keep your mouth shut then act like a fool.
If Obama wants evidence racism still is rampant, all he has to do is look to his good old friend Al Sharpton, and his polarizing actions, and who makes his living from faning the flames of racial divide.
Conversations Over Dinner with a Brainless Liberal
Monday, June 22, 2015
Saturday, May 9, 2015
Obama, A HUGE Mistake.
I do not support Barack Obama and therefore didn't expect anything good
from his presidency. There is one thing I was sure about though. I was
sure a black president would be able to address racial issues in the US
and finally solve them. And lots of whites voted for him because they thought he would improve race relations...the opposite has resulted.
For over 200 years America is being torn apart by ethnic conflicts, bigotry and misunderstanding. Black liberal president is a perfect candidate for this kind of change, yet he failed. He could have improved the situation, instead he made it worse
And to make matters even worse, Hillary Clinton thinks the same way.
For over 200 years America is being torn apart by ethnic conflicts, bigotry and misunderstanding. Black liberal president is a perfect candidate for this kind of change, yet he failed. He could have improved the situation, instead he made it worse
And to make matters even worse, Hillary Clinton thinks the same way.
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
“Was Benghazi a "Spontaneous Attack," or Planned Terrorist Attack”
Since I started blogging and founded my own blog “Conversations Over Dinner with a Brainless Liberal “. I have tried to listen to the other sides points of view that were different from my own. I must admit that I am guilty of more than stirring up a bit of controversy. And I had the audacity to question their Liar in Chief.. Because of their attitude and their willingness to attack anyone who dares to point out the truth about their agenda, I have been called just about every slang word in the books. However I have had an attitude change of my own, and refuse to lie down and play dead..
Having said that, let me get to the topic of today’s blog.
“Was Benghazi a "Spontaneous Attack," or Planned Terrorist Attack”
I have been reading all the convoluted explanations for Benghazi and laughing over some of them for two days now. Most on the left seem to say it was a spontaneous attack based on a video while at the same time saying "it was an act of terror."
The best is a Progressive blog that agrees with the Times and says that there is no doubt that it was because of that famous Video.
I also have no doubt that the Obama administration told the NY Slimes to say the attack was the result of a YouTube Video. And even called for an apology from the Right.
Well folks...if it was an act of terror it was by definition a planned and coordinated terror attack. So which is it? A response to the Video and spontaneous uprising, or a planned terrorist attack by al-Qaida?
It is time to take a stand. Which is it? And why did both Obama and Hillary Clinton claim that when they spoke to the reporters in the White House Rose Garden Obama they admitted it was a terrorist attack by al-Qaida but now they are trying to weasel and that doesn’t cut it. Either it was planned and coordinated or it was not. So which is it?
Having said that, let me get to the topic of today’s blog.
“Was Benghazi a "Spontaneous Attack," or Planned Terrorist Attack”
I have been reading all the convoluted explanations for Benghazi and laughing over some of them for two days now. Most on the left seem to say it was a spontaneous attack based on a video while at the same time saying "it was an act of terror."
The best is a Progressive blog that agrees with the Times and says that there is no doubt that it was because of that famous Video.
I also have no doubt that the Obama administration told the NY Slimes to say the attack was the result of a YouTube Video. And even called for an apology from the Right.
Well folks...if it was an act of terror it was by definition a planned and coordinated terror attack. So which is it? A response to the Video and spontaneous uprising, or a planned terrorist attack by al-Qaida?
It is time to take a stand. Which is it? And why did both Obama and Hillary Clinton claim that when they spoke to the reporters in the White House Rose Garden Obama they admitted it was a terrorist attack by al-Qaida but now they are trying to weasel and that doesn’t cut it. Either it was planned and coordinated or it was not. So which is it?
Saturday, August 31, 2013
Is Obama Losing Support For His Plans to Attack Syria?
Are we going to start a war because Obama's credibility is slipping?
Obama has NO support for this war from American Citizens, from our allies (whats left of them), and from many members of Congress.
So where does he go from here?
The answer my friends is Blowing in the Wind, the answer is blowing in the wind.
Obama has NO support for this war from American Citizens, from our allies (whats left of them), and from many members of Congress.
So where does he go from here?
The answer my friends is Blowing in the Wind, the answer is blowing in the wind.
Friday, June 7, 2013
There has been changes. We now have millions of illegals working our jobs and we get to pay higher taxes. Higher taxes on the wealthy would have been a great idea, but there are loopholes that allow them to pay nothing, so higher taxes don't affect them. The middle class once again got screwed and the hope for any change is all but a broken promise. What difference does it make? Millions of idiotic Liberals still adore their Master..
Monday, November 5, 2012
The Worst News from Benghazi
By James Lewis
It is now apparent that the president of the United States countermanded standing Pentagon orders to help American personnel under attack. Ambassador Stevens and three others were left to die without AC-130 Spectres and rescue teams that are always on standby in the Africom theater. Only the White House could have countermanded those standing orders, and we know that POTUS had an emergency meeting with Panetta and Hillary within 55 minutes of the start of the attack. AFRICOM's General Carter F. Ham was fired -- presumably for wanting to rescue the Americans under fire.
Ambassador Stevens and his people were left to die to protect a deep-cover NSC-CIA operation. But what could be so important that 32 Americans had to be abandoned to the mercy of al-Qaeda? Benghazi was a major gun-running operation, funneling armaments from the crushed Libyan regime of Moammar Gaddafi to rebel forces opposing Syria's Assad. Ambassador Stevens was negotiating with a whole Star Wars barroom thug collection of bad actors, a reported ten different jihadist militias operating in Benghazi.
The most damning Benghazi revelation is the Obama policy that led to the disaster: Obama's four-year policy of secretly supporting violent Islamists against civilized Muslims, like Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak, and modern-minded people in countries like Turkey and Iran. We used to support moderate Muslims until Obama took over; now we support our deadly enemies. In Benghazi, some of those gangster types turned against us, tore the cover off the operation, burned out Ambassador Stevens, and killed American defenders with mortar fire. Our defenders had the AQIM mortar crew laser-marked for jet bombers and gunships that never showed up.
Too bad the American people expected him to fight for our side. His heart is not with all of the American people.
He's been badmouthing us for 4 years, and now this.
I hope people will realize the option they have to have someone who will support his Oath of Office next time. That will only be if we elect Mitt Romney.
Otherwise, it's four more years of him hobnobbing with states that have always been terrorist sponsors and whose sole mission in life is to hurt Americans and America any which way they can.
Obama picked in favor of the terrorists and not America's ambassador, his man and his representative in Benghazi.
How sad. ___________
It is now apparent that the president of the United States countermanded standing Pentagon orders to help American personnel under attack. Ambassador Stevens and three others were left to die without AC-130 Spectres and rescue teams that are always on standby in the Africom theater. Only the White House could have countermanded those standing orders, and we know that POTUS had an emergency meeting with Panetta and Hillary within 55 minutes of the start of the attack. AFRICOM's General Carter F. Ham was fired -- presumably for wanting to rescue the Americans under fire.
Ambassador Stevens and his people were left to die to protect a deep-cover NSC-CIA operation. But what could be so important that 32 Americans had to be abandoned to the mercy of al-Qaeda? Benghazi was a major gun-running operation, funneling armaments from the crushed Libyan regime of Moammar Gaddafi to rebel forces opposing Syria's Assad. Ambassador Stevens was negotiating with a whole Star Wars barroom thug collection of bad actors, a reported ten different jihadist militias operating in Benghazi.
The most damning Benghazi revelation is the Obama policy that led to the disaster: Obama's four-year policy of secretly supporting violent Islamists against civilized Muslims, like Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak, and modern-minded people in countries like Turkey and Iran. We used to support moderate Muslims until Obama took over; now we support our deadly enemies. In Benghazi, some of those gangster types turned against us, tore the cover off the operation, burned out Ambassador Stevens, and killed American defenders with mortar fire. Our defenders had the AQIM mortar crew laser-marked for jet bombers and gunships that never showed up.
Too bad the American people expected him to fight for our side. His heart is not with all of the American people.
He's been badmouthing us for 4 years, and now this.
I hope people will realize the option they have to have someone who will support his Oath of Office next time. That will only be if we elect Mitt Romney.
Otherwise, it's four more years of him hobnobbing with states that have always been terrorist sponsors and whose sole mission in life is to hurt Americans and America any which way they can.
Obama picked in favor of the terrorists and not America's ambassador, his man and his representative in Benghazi.
How sad. ___________
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
